Soon after we were married, Joel and I hit the road for Southern Oregon, leaving the Portland scene behind us. I quit my job at Coffee People, and he quit his at the microelectronics company. The season was fall, and the light–if visible–was gold like latticework, filigreed, taunting, disappearing. We may have listened to Harvest Moon on the way down. We might also have passed a hearse, and a woman who ran across the freeway, hands on face, screaming.

By the time we arrived, it was cold, as well as dark and unfamiliar. It was Halloween. Some friends of ours who lived in the area swung by with a fifth of whiskey and canned beer and helped us unpack the moving truck. And that was the start to our new life together, in a place distant to my childhood home. Depression soon set in for many reasons, just as the winter settled over the world. But in my mind, I erase those reasons. The genre of memoir relies on picking through the aftermath of numerous storms and discovering familiar relics–a life edited, in other words.

And so I skip to summer. We lived on 4th Street in Ashland, in the bottommost apartment of a smooth, stuccoed building constructed in 1916. Our place had at one time been a garage, and it came complete with louvered window glass. Its placement insured its coolness, so when I emerged from the land of the louvered glass, the hot southern sun blasted me as did the smell of dust and hot grapes.

By summer, after handing out my resume at multiple cafes around town, I was gainfully employed at a coffeehouse in the neighboring city of Medford. What did I do on my days off? What could I do, but hop across the street from my apartment to the 4th Street Cafe? This is what baristas do–they survive off the caffeine hanging in the air. They lap it up, breathe it in. And for my part, I carried a stack of lined paper and a handful of pens and pencils and scratched out my first novel a mano to the sounds and scents of coffee.

Back up. We haven’t arrived yet. Walk through the alley beside the stuccoed apartment building. Ashland is one of those towns connected from street to street through dusty alleyways, and these alleys not only provide shortcuts, but they supply intimate views of interior life, such that the clusters of fruit hanging from private yards become yours for the taking, as does the shade from hanging wisteria. Intimacy, summer, grapes–they blend together in delicious memories that might have been purely mental, even back then, even when the 90′s world was physical, tangible.

Steal a handful of grapes and eat them individually, spitting the seeds out as you cross through the alley, and then 4th Street, and then wander up the sidewalk until you reach the entrance to the cafe. Enter to the sound of wind chimes and native fluting–follow the call of the flautist to the back garden. Buy a cup of strong black coffee, sit and watch your lined pages ruffle in the breeze.

The flautist will attempt a conversation with you. He’s an older man with long, graying hair and beard. He’ll discuss [or, rather, talk at you about] religion and politics and inform you that his Sioux ancestors worshiped the Creator of the universe long before white men brought Jesus, and you won’t know whether he’s rejecting your religion or connecting himself with you in the way all humans are linked through a common Great Spirit. And you also won’t know how this man can sit fluting around with no real book knowledge or music lessons, but still be able to sit in the present, comfortable in himself and his abilities.

You won’t know because you’ve already exited the premises, if not in body, but in mind and deep yearning. [End Stop. I'm reentering my own memoir, thanks.] Especially when I was younger, exiting the world seemed the only way to master any subject or art form. Long before the summer, in that cold, dry winter I skipped over, I visited a music store and stared longingly at the racks of hanging violins, which chattered at me in chiding little voices. I played the violin as a child, but I never really played, and I could only imagine finding an alternate space for myself in which I would leave the world behind and become a musician. I’m not sure why this is–why I must exit the world in order to master a subject, but the necessity entangled with the impossibility has kept my life on hold for as long as I can remember. Because I’m still waiting to exit the world, where I plan to refine and master numerous disciplines, I haven’t lived. I’ve never truly lived.

The first book I scratched onto notepaper was–no surprise–about a violin player who exits her life, moves from Portland to Florence, Oregon, where she dwells in a parallel existence that enables her to reenter the world at large. I desired to be her, even though I made her homely, but she only existed in my imagination. And so, although I fashioned her to be real, she never really exited her life and, consequently, never reentered.

Places of the imagination exist in a way I can’t reach to grasp, and the same problem occurs in memoir. I’m busy working at leaving the world of my current self, who sits on my porch in New Mexico, and I’m doing this through selective memories. I’m creating positive spaces through negatives, negatives through positives, and I’m mastering nothing.

Where did I go–that girl who sat in the 4th Street Cafe? And how can I reach her? I’m lost. I’m neither here nor there, and all I have left is a day-old pot of coffee that brings me no closer to exiting my present reality. And how will I edit this moment later? Will I add flowers to the desert, stark red roofs, an unreal blue sky to cap off eternity?

Share

Tags: , , , , ,

“Yes, I too think there is lots to be said for being no longer young; and I do most heartily agree that it is just as well to be past the age when one expects or desires to attract the other sex. It’s natural enough in our species, as in others, that the young birds should show off their plumage — in the mating season. But the trouble in the modern world is that there’s a tendency to rush all the birds on to that age as soon as possible and then keep them there as late as possible, thus losing all the real value of the other parts of life in a senseless, pitiful attempt to prolong what, after all, is neither its wisest, its happiest, or most innocent period.

I suspect merely commercial motives are behind it all: for it is at the showing-off stage that birds of both sexes have least sales-resistance” (C.S. Lewis, Letters to an American Lady Aug. 1, 1953)!

Very little time elapses before I’m regaled yet again with the notion that Christian women ought to keep themselves up so their husbands won’t stray. I’ve heard it from pastors. I’ve read it in Christian marital advice books. When I was a newly-married wife, I can’t tell you how often I heard this: “If the barn needs painting, paint it.” This is an actual quote from a mega Christian pastor, or multiple ones supposedly, though I’ve never heard it from the horses’ mouths [if women are barns, then, by deduction. . .], just the perpetual repetition of it.

I can no longer abide this doctrine. Don’t take me wrong–I was never okay with it, but I’ve finally reached the saturation point. Demanding that a woman maintain her looks is a burden that God never meant for her to carry. This preaching is a sign that American Christianity is immature, and I’m brought to frustrated tears by the kinds of comments I read on blog discussions of this topic, comments that are so hateful toward women who–gasp!–put on weight over the years that I want to vomit. I want to vomit at the image these Christians are thrusting at us of disrespectful, overweight wives shoveling donuts in their gaping maws, then swallowing all the fat and carbs down to their distended gullets.

That’s right–didn’t you know this? According to many Christians, wives who gain weight or who wear ragged clothes or whose skin isn’t forever glowing with youth and health are DISRESPECTFUL to their husbands.

Let me be honest. When I was in my twenties, I cared far too much about my appearance. I cared because I was immature, not because I was a respectful wife. Now I’ve passed on to a better stage of my life in which I’ve stopped caring with such fervency. I’m nearly forty, for heaven’s sake. Why should beauty be my primary concern? I have a husband to love, four children to feed and clothe, friends who need my hospitality, books to write. I’ve moved on to better and bigger issues–the ones God always wanted me to care about primarily.

Did you read the C.S. Lewis quote above? I’m far from thinking that Lewis is a prophet or the arbiter of the gospel, but when he wrote that letter, he was a few years away from death, and he expressed the wisdom of age in his words. In fact, he was wise in a way that I wish the church would be. It’s time American Christians moved past the stage of displaying its adolescent plumage. We have many more important concerns. Oh, wait, we always have had more important concerns.

Women aren’t barns. They’re living, breathing human beings. If you want to paint a barn, head on over to your neighbors’ farm. Then, you might actually fulfill the commandment to love your neighbor as yourself, rather than the nonexistent one about loathing your wife [or if you are a wife, yourself] because her [your] skin isn’t as dewy as a newborn babe’s.

***I’m editing in to add some of the real reasons women are prone to putting on weight that have nothing to do with disrespecting their husbands:

1. Women have more estrogen than men. Estrogen attracts fat cells.

2. We are bombarded with chemical estrogen and estrogen mimickers through pesticides and packaging and birth control, and that’s in addition to what women already have naturally.

3. Many women have broken metabolisms for many reasons, including thyroid issues. Fluoride may strengthen teeth, but it destroys the thyroid. Women have much bigger thyroids than men have.

4. Women put on weight for childbearing, and many women don’t lose it. This wasn’t a crime in the past. It was expected, as it should be now.

Share

My Fave Music:

My favorite song in the whole world is It’s Friday by Rebecca Black! Her voice sends me in a tailspin of confusion, while the lyrics keep me glued to my seat in awe. The first time I heard the song, I was so taken aback by its rave sound that I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry.

My Fashion Sense:

I’ve always had one, and a very strong one, at that. I’m pretty much known by my friends as the fashion goddess. They’ve long taken my lead in the loose-look hairstyle and what color of western shirt matches best with flip-flops. For the last twenty years, I’ve also been a leader in colorful pen and chopstick accessories for the hair. In fact, I’ve even designed a line of gorgeous pens and pencils that can be worn in the hair while sleeping!

Since wearing these hair pieces, I’ve accomplished amazing acts in the bedroom! Often, I wake up to find haiku scribbled on my pillowcase! Here is the one I found this morning:

It’s Friday, Friday!
Tomorrow is Saturday!
Yesterday was Thurs.–

My Poetry:

This goes without saying! I’m an award-winning writer of avant-garde haiku!

Share

My life is full of language as a helium balloon is full of helium. I almost said, “. . .the way a balloon is filled with hot air.” But regardless of what light, airy simile I choose to use, the law of buoyancy still implies that I rise like a cork in a basin of water when I immerse myself in language.

The other day, I shared what might happen if students aren’t allowed to write their essays in heroic couplets. They might never turn into hunchbacked little men who are able to translate ancient Greek documents into English (see Alexander Pope). Alas, I discovered another consequence of leaning too heavily on the five-paragraph essay format. Students might never understand how to write in complete sentences. I learned this while researching samples of full-point SAT essays, all of which used perfect five-paragraph (or four-paragraph) essay format, and many of which used fragmented and run-on sentences for the sake of bad communication.

Let’s study sentences for a moment. At essence, a sentence is a group of words. A group of words could contain any type thereof. Jellyfish, sword, and beanie-baby. is a group of nouns followed by a period and, therefore, a sentence. One verb might also do, just to destroy the idea of group mentality [who needs groups, anyway? I'm a loner!]: “Swim?” Or, perhaps, a nominal group [a group in name, only, of course] would fit the bill: “Swimmingly happy jellyfish.” Some sentences involve best friends: “Lucy and Jane.”

Sentences are, more essentially, expressions of verbal or written language. They don’t even have to be composed of words. Who’s to say that

“A little learning is a dangerous thing.
Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian Spring;
There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
and drinking largely sobers us again”
(from A. Pope’s Essay on Criticism)

is better than

“when faces called flowers float out of the ground
and breathing is wishing and wishing is having-
but keeping is downward and doubting and never
-it’s april(yes,april;my darling)it’s spring”
(from ee cumming’s 67)

is better than

“Skit skat skoodle doot, flip flop flee” (from Martin and Archambault’s Chicka Chicka Boom Boom).

If the words or sounds give you that squeaky, helium, lighter-than-air feeling, then what’s the problem? The problem is a lack of communication. Now, I understand that Chicka Chicka Boom Boom is a child’s book, a picture tome, and its purpose is to be silly and create slapdash rhythm. In the silliness sense, Chicka Chicka Boom Boom achieves its intended purpose. But it achieves no other. Who could possibly learn the alphabet from it, or understand why letters climb coconut trees? And why do lowercase letters sneak out at night, thereby disobeying the capital ones? And why do I have to read this drivel to my young children? Why? Why?

The ultimate purpose of the sentence is communication of some kind [Yes, I figured that out all on my own]. In the case of the banal five-paragraph essay, it should intend to simplify complex ideas into readable points. If the writer fails to pen major sentences, the writer has failed at the primary, intended purpose of the condensed essay form. What is a major sentence? Since I’ve broken down sentences into their most basic forms, now we must differentiate between grammatical sentences and ungrammatical ones.

While you could call my examples above sentences, even the one verb–Swim?–you couldn’t call them major sentences. They are sentences that hit minor notes, sentences that adhere to the barest of definitions. Begin with a capital and end with punctuation, and you will create a sentence. Wow! (This is a minor sentence.) That’s neat! (This is a major sentence because it also contains a noun and a verb.)

Swim! Why? The swimmingly happy jellyfish are headed this way! What a relief that we finally graduated to the majors. I wouldn’t have liked to suffer a jellyfish sting. Remember–my goal is to float like a cork to the top, not sink like a punctured balloon.

The jellyfish will sting you on the toes,
So–swim!–my child, away from language woes!

Thank you, but Pope would have despised my not-so-heroic couplet.

Share

A few years ago, I read an article in a home-school journal on writing as a subject. According to the author, who taught at the university level at the same time that she homeschooled her children, the only important writing skill to pass on to students was the ubiquitous five-paragraph essay. In this theory of hers, poetry was unimportant because “children could just learn it on their own.” Creative writing of any sort was relegated to the child hobbyist. Only the didactic, robotic five-paragraph essay would rescue a seaworthy child and carry her through the heaving waters of college.

The article infuriated me and, as I usually do, I wrote a rebuttal letter in my head that I never sent. In the last several days, I’ve pondered what it means to write memoir and, in so doing, I recalled that little piece of editorial oddness. I asked myself the typical ranting, blood-letting questions [in which my mind bleeds out from lecherous frustration]: did that home-school teacher/professor not study history? Did she not understand rhetoric? Did she not understand that poems, in their more traditional English usage, could be called essays? If Alexander Pope had time-traveled to the oughts through a Newtonian Time Telescope, he might have had a thing or two to explain to this so-called educator.

First of all, he might have explained that poetry has a long and beautiful history. Poetry takes many forms and involves the use of complex thought and movement, all wrapped up in smart rhetoric and carefully meted rhythm. Next, he might have whipped out a copy or two of his poetic essays: Essay on Man or Essay on Criticism. When the educator inevitably shook her head at him, she might have cried, “But the author asserts opinions! And these opinions aren’t in five paragraphs! I can’t even count how many stanzas there are. And what do you call that rhyme scheme?” After the expected faint of the modern woman, Pope might have thought her unworthy, but, still, he might have given her a rundown of heroic couplets, because, after all, the author of them must have been heroic, himself.

“But who are you–you hunchbacked toad?!” the professor might have spluttered.

And it really might have been been Pope who shot through the Newtonian Time Telescope, but what if–instead–an aged Montaigne had approached a young Galileo and said, “Say there, Sonny, would you transport me to the late 17th C with your totally awesome quantum kinematics?” And then, perhaps, it might have been Montaigne who flew through time and space via the Newtonian Time Telescope [once he'd landed in Newton's cave and introduced himself].

I’m certain Montaigne would have immediately set pen to paper and ascribed his personal feelings, musings, and ideas on 21st C life. Then he would have pronounced them essays. And why do I think he would have done such a preposterous thing? Montaigne invented the term. Back in his day, the 16th C, he called his attempts to understand the world essays [which, in his language, meant exactly that--essai, attempt].

What is my point in all this, aside from discovering how many times I can use the brand name Newtonian Time Telescope™ in as short of space as possible? Isn’t that what it’s all about, anyway–compression? In our modern education system, we’ve compressed the definition of essay into a tight, five-paragraph box that doesn’t simply contain condensed language, but condensed or compressed ideas. The landscape of ideas should involve expansion, feeling, rhetoric, and maybe even rhyme. When we insist that our children stop writing their essays in heroic couplets, as they are wont to do, we are limiting their thinking powers [all right, I did this when I was in the 8th grade, but only once, and the teacher completely ignored my rhymed lines. Or maybe she didn't notice--and so much for my hard work].

This was meant to be an article on the nature of memoir, which, to me, resembles the original essence of essai. How Alexander Pope worked his little hunchbacked frame into it, I’ve no idea, but probably it was through the Newtonian Time Telescope. The Galilean Quantum Kinetic machine was pretty much the opposite of de rigueur by Pope’s time [so sue me. I couldn't think of a stylish antonym].

Good memoirs are connected thoughts–essays–of a unique person’s experiences. In a well-written memoir, the reader sees the world anew through the eyes of the memoirist, through a narrative that stirs the heart and awakens the mind. And for that, I love memoirs, am, in fact, addicted to them. I have no desire to write them for publication because this blog is already the chronicling of my mind. This is it. This is my memoir, world! I’m holding to the Montaignesque tradition with my little corner of the internet. I’ll leave the five paragraph jobs for yawning professors.

Share

Tags: , , , ,

« Older entries § Newer entries »